Don't Ask Rambi Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rambi who wrote (22947)	4/21/1999 9:55:00 PM
From: DScottD	Read Replies (2) of 71178

It was a regularly scheduled board meeting and the gun-toting issue was already on the agenda but, before yesterday, it was felt the board would table the issue until a later meeting as there was a split among the board members and not enough votes to pass the motion. There were 3 in favor of letting all security personnel carry guns, 3 against and one who wanted to limit the gun carrying to a select group of officers at specific schools that are considered to be more at risk. Then this thing happened yesterday and one of the against changed her mind and the one who preferred limiting the gun carriers moved to table until the next meeting because he was convinced that to vote on the issue last night would be seen as a knee jerk reaction. That motion failed, then the board voted 4-3 in favor of arming all the security officers at all schools. And we still are looking for a superintendent. IMHO, increasing security isn't the answer. It may keep some kids from bringing weapons to school, but the kids who do these terrible things have demonstrated that they don't really care if they get caught and mostly seem to be trying to attract attention.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next