Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (43486)	4/22/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) of 67261

One would have to go back and apply the growth stated in each Reagan budget proposal as applied to the prior Reagan budget proposal. The executive branch's budget proposals are formulated using the prior year's spending levels which are passed by Congress, hence the actual spending proposals would be much lower if they were based on the assumption that the Reagan budgets passed unchanged. I've explained this about the budget proposal and appropriations process several times. You should try boning up on the federal budget process. I worked about 10 years ago on some federal budgetting systems. re: coward If the shoe fits. Considering that you were calling me a coward, it fits you. As for the others, that is your problem.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next