SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WebNode.com - $4B Contract for Next Generation Internet

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Josef Svejk who wrote (407)4/23/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (2) of 588
 
My favourite part is where Roger Myers explains that there was some malice involved which has significantly damaged [reference deleted]'s reputation.

Of course, the original release ran with a standard-industry practice Dateline:

<Story Title>

Business Wire; Safety Harbor FL, April 1, 1999

<Start Story Content>

Now—ummm…which part of that [reference deleted] reference is untrue, and/or malicious? It is just a standard dateline which one sees everyday in any news story, such as:

<Story Title>

Associated Press; Littleton CO, April 23, 1999

<Start Story Content>
_____________________________________________________________
And of course, it's true - [reference deleted] distributed the release. And of course, they received full and prompt payment. Furthermore, we deleted it after they asked us to! It should have ended right there. "But, nNNOOooooooo......," in the immortal words of comedian, Steve Martin.

IMO, the better case for malicious damage should be [reference deleted] bringing suit against themselves for exposing themselves to severe public ridicule by persuing this charade as far as they have.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext