SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : C-Cube
CUBE 36.22+1.2%Dec 17 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Black-Scholes who wrote (40102)4/23/1999 5:46:00 PM
From: Robert Schwartz  Read Replies (1) of 50808
 
semi off-topic:

BLACK-SCHOLES recently posted on the BRCM string:
"Guys - great company. It really is. Its stock price is just ABSURDLY overvalued. Of course there's going to be competition. It's probably already arrived. Like FredE said, this is a total replay of C-Cube three years ago. Except now C-Cube is ABSURDLY undervalued. Hey, at least you can look forward to that day. Then you can pull your hair out waiting for it to be recognized again."

Black-Scholes: If you are going to use terms like "absurdly overvalued" or "absurdly undervalued" relative to any stock, you may want to spend a few minutes giving some support for your opinions. I don't know whether you are right or wrong (I suspect wrong as I am long BRCM), but I do know there are a number of serious investors out here who don't have time to spend listening to unsubstantiated rhetoric, good or bad. If you get a chance, I would like for you to spend a few minutes letting us all know why BRCM is "absurdly overvalued" and why BRCM has anything to do with C-Cube. It appears to me that if I followed your advice, I would have shorted BRCM and longed C-Cube. From the charts, it looks as though I would have lost a good bit of my savings!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext