Syncrude, in my post I said "If I remember correctly ..." so my statement was qualified. Once again you are correct! It was not you but John Sladek making the accusation of the RCMP investigation. I guess as one gets older "it's the memory that goes first" and in this case my memory failed me.
But there was a reason you stuck in my mind. You were there during the same time frame expressing severe doubts and questioning the viability of the company. That was as far back as Dec. 11th starting with your first posts to this thread (#112, 116, 118, etc.). Here's one example of your writings at the time ...
"I have tried hard to see what this company's potential might be, but still have not found what it might be. From a past history of marketing in the gambling field to web page design. There does not appear to much in the way of substance here, only a short term trading speculation.
Thanks for your attempts to provide insight into this play, but for the moment, it looks as if it will take a lot of promotion to compensate for the apparent lack of fundamentals for this stock."
I wonder, in light of the above comments, with the then current share price around the $1 mark, if you have mellowed your skeptical outlook? Jazzss is correct and we should stop "mucking about with the past". I apologize if I offended, it was an honest mistake. Your current insight into the future of the company would be appreciated. Do you still see the company as a "short term trading speculation", or do you see potential for more? |
