Hi Suzanne,
I want to take this opportunity to personally thank you publicly for all the effort you have put in to adding to our DD and sharing... and to help confirm what I learned in the time I spent at TSIG and during the multitude of calls I make to management every week. What you have done is exactly what others should be doing if they have questions... speak with management.
Some may call me a "hyper", but I prefer to call it enthusiasm based upon every fact I can get and confirm regarding TSIG. That does not mean that I don't find problems (such as delivery delays of merchandise), but rather than bash my own investment, I prefer to take a more aggressive proactive role and "scream" to management directly... and will continue to do so until a problem is resolved. There are some on this thread who are very well aware from phone conversations and e-mails we have had that I have no hesitation in speaking my mind with management... and, yes, they usually do listen ... at least to the comments. As I have tried to say so often and as you brought out earlier today, TSIG is in its development stage. But, I think we both agree that those days are drawing to a close and "production" is about to begin. Even with that, however, there will still always be bumps in the road (ask Intel about the fiasco with their Pentium chip... just as an example).
<< ...it certainly lends weight to the theory that the company is looking for better terms, not additional funding. >> From my observations, that statement appears to be quite valid.
Thanks again for stepping-up to the plate and calling the company yourself. If more shareholders would do the same and look at the names who have become involved with this company perhaps the fiasco of the past few weeks would never have occurred.
Best always,
Marty |