MIDL .... A Real Sleeper Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Shoot1st who wrote (5544)	4/25/1999 2:47:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (3) of 7039

Oh Good Grief another SI slammer without facts. Dusty is one of the brighter folks on these threads. She has far too much strength, stamina and resources to need anything I've got....including help. Honest people do well listening to her. Frauds give her grief. FRAUD was done by the people she has never slammed and believed absolutely, who, btw, are out of the country and can't be touched. But if you had researched this stock for the truth you would have known that. As far as resources Dusty has yet to prove one source of resources but then again you have not followed her posts where she was one of the biggest cheerleaders on this thread back then. ALso she had contacts in Dallas that she claimed did a full DD on this stock and she was telling everyone to BUY it "Going to the moon" just like she has LGOV. Leopards don't change their spots, do they. No and the DF affiliates are still having influence on this thread and others. Maybe you should be careful just who you side with since you HATE SI. Please show me the posts where you feel Dusty and even remotely told the truth. Show me where she is not in violation of the SEC rule 10.b5. I would really like to see these posts for the underlying basis of your defense since Dusty has asked you for it and you are so willing to give. Even Dusty knows she has been lying on every point about this stock and all her crap that has been disproven. Not one fact does she have or can she prove. See Dick lie....see Jane cover.......see Spots fleas and tics suck blood. Maybe it should be "See Dusty LIE ... see Shoot1st (an others get DUPED)in an attempt to cover and SHOOT themself in the foot for defending someone who posts only convenient wisdom, innuendoes and lies based on the information supplied ny the ones that nailed the financial community. Hey shoot1st, if you are going to slam a whatever have you ever thought about reading the filings or does that blow your whole logic like it has hers. Is it her opinon or is the underlying basis relly a direct violation to SEC rule 10b5. I was here at the start and I will be here till the bitter or joyful end like I said before and I have been through a lot in this convenient innuendo scenario. but you are right there are fleas, ticks and dogs on the internet and SI ... can make them out without a program (DD) At least SI does not condemn folks on innuendoes. Witch-hunting went out a long time ago. :-) GB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next