>With all due respect your post does not make any [logical, economic, corporate finance...sense].
Uh, huh. Spare me, ok, Norman? Everything you have said has been a complete whinge on the issues. All you succeed in doing is destroying whatever credibility you have left (probably none) step by step. My comment was clearly sarcastic, as was your threat of suing clearly false. Is is beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are simply attempting to use the net in order in overinflate yourself beyond the Norman that you are.
>Actually, and for your edification, TMSR unequivocally beats the S&P >500 in revenue growth (G*) during said time interval
For instance the above statement is completely false. It would be only true if you stopped the time interval in 1997.
Could you explain why you continue to misrepresent this company, and at no personal gain for yourself (as said posts are only read by a small percentage of individual investors) and possible misinforming an unfortunate few?
>until q1 1998 TMSRs ROE handily exceeded its cost of capital, hence >its back-to-back
Precisely - in other words it hasn't performed well since then, as you well know. It hasn't achieved good results since 1997.
The only thing that you clearly pointed out, is despite TMSR current overvaluation, your investment in said company has been soundly beaten by a very low risk index fund over time.
Try bedazzling someone else with irrelevant info, and get back to the
sales and growth *currently*. How about you compare the competition?
BTW, which book did you read that advised you to annoy company officials in requests for insider knowledge? |
