SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : AGM (VSE) AROYF (OTC) Ag Armeno Mines & Minerals
AGM 170.00+1.5%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (249)4/25/1999 7:59:00 PM
From: Ed Fishbaine  Read Replies (1) of 317
 
Karl

On addendum to my previous reponse to you:

Newmont plans to begin production at the BATU HIJAU in December. As I see it it would be to their advantage to settle the lawsuit with AGM
(again, should venue be maintained in Canada) prior to beginning production. If they can absorb Meruch's 20% (or even the 18% involved in AGM's suit) the cash flow from this interest will accrue to them not to Meruch. Should the law suit drag on for 3 years and then be settled in favor of AGM there is 3 years of lost cash flow to Newmont. It would seem that if their assessment is that there will ultimately be a settlemrnt in favor of AGM, or even if this is likely though not assured, an arrangement whereby AGM acquires the 18% interest from Meruch and Newmont then buys AGM would be very much to their advantage. Consider that a buyout of AGM for shares of Newmont would undoubtedly be acceptable to AGM. In this way Newmont acquires a cash cow in exchange for shares.

For this reason I speculate that a settlement will occur prior to December and considerably in advance of December the movement towards such a settlement will become evident.

Ed

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext