SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 459.86+0.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Shea Jones who wrote (21583)4/25/1999 10:19:00 PM
From: Sir Francis Drake  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Hmm... things well in hand. Maybe. If they were so well in hand, you wouldn't have the spectacle of M first wanting to go to RR. BG would have known about it - is it possible that M said NOTHING to BG all along and secretly lobbied for the RR post? Are we to believe that BG knew nothing about it? If he knew nothing - then he's not as well in control as you think. If he did, and M STILL went ahead publicly with the RR move, then it means BG was not able to resolve things with him ahead of time - and so again is not in full control.

Bottom line: if things were fully "in hand" by BG, you wouldn't have the public spectacle of M going for RR, and BG having to equally publicly veto the move. Sorry, any way you slice it, whatever occured, was not a display of things "well in hand".

I'm not making a big deal out of this, but I think it's still good to be accurate about characterizing the situation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext