Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (56348)	4/25/1999 11:17:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Read Replies (2) of 1571399

Re: "he received a "loaded & stacked" machine from AMD sporting a 450 MHz Kmart 63 and 2 MegaBytes L3 cache in early December, tested it and posted the benchmarks in mid-December." Paul, you know that is horsesh*t yet you ontinue to post it. How do you expect anyone to believe anything you post if you insist on continuing to lie about this? anandtech.com anandtech.com The test system had a Matrox G200 (the TNT is/was a better card); a WDC Caviar AC35100 hard drive--far from the top of the line, considering my desktop has one and I bought it in September of 1997; only one Voodoo 2 card; only 64 mb of ram. The only "souped up" aspect of the system was 2 mb of L3 cache, which costs about $10 more than a 1 mb board, and accounted for only a 3% performance difference under Winstone 98. Even if AMD did send Anand the machine that he tested (which I find VERY hard to believe--in fact, I doubt he even got the engineering sample of the chip direct from AMD), that machine was far from "loaded and stacked." Kevin

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next