SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maintenance who wrote (18609)4/27/1999 12:39:00 PM
From: Gord Bolton  Read Replies (1) of 26850
 
Thank you for kindly for your opinion.
The precedents here are hundreds of years old and have not been successfully challenged in living memory.
In essence Aber is looking for exemtion from the Contract which they entered into. That is why they are referring to what has been termed the widows and orphans act and looking for some kind of opening to argue estoppel. Other assertions of verbal agreements etc. etc. indicate that they would like to argue that they have been lead out on a limb and then had the limb cut off.
These points are all kind of interesting, but if you read the assertions carefully along with superior court judgements they have no bearing on this matter.
There is a contact in place. The contract has been applied according to its terms. Aber argues that that is not fair. They should never have signed the contract-or they should have complied with the terms to maintain their interest.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News