e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology

EDIG 0.0001000

0.0%

Mar 20 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MWS who wrote (3009)	4/27/1999 12:56:00 PM
From: cAPSLOCK	Read Replies (1) of 18366

As you are aware, all these compression schemes EPAC, MP3, AAC employ psycho-acoustic models to eliminate masked audio from the data stream. That's why I was surprised to see claims of a such a large difference in compression. I can see subtle differences in sub-band selection, redundancy coding etc giving rise to small differences in overall compression, but not 10 times - even 3 or 4 seems a lot. But I'm not an audio expert and was wondering if I missed something here. Well I am an audio expert blush and you are right on the mark. It would be amazing to do that kind of improvement over mp3. And if anyone could do it it would be this team of companies. The folks at Lucent are no slackers... ;) But alot of wierd numbers have been bandied about on this thread recently, and if I am not mistaken the size of an EPAC compressed file is going to be very close to the size of an mp3. Therefore download times will be about the same. This will all be totally MOOT in a short matter of time anyway. Bandwidth is going up faster than compression brings file sizes down. And I just bought a freakin 17 gig hard drive for $250. File size will, in the end, be of less significance. On the subject of audio quality and AAC which was brought up here before -> Both tests I have run with my equipment, and my ears (the real equipment) tell me that all the buzz over AAC sounding better is bogus. It is swimmier an the highs... Much more distorted than an mp3 (which is pretty easy to complain about all on it's own). The sound quality of EPAC will be important. This relies on decoders as much as encoders and p-a modeling. But this is still going to be a very minor issue... Most people will be happy with nearly any of the formats... The REAL catch.. The place I believe the rubber is gonna really make contact with the asphalt so to speak is with the almightly Music Industry. There is ALOT of huge money gathered together to work deals with a bunch more huge money.... The Music industry, and format providers are going to want very badly to come together to insure that money can still be made selling music in the digital age. The music industry is going to want the bvest partners possible in this endevour so they can SURVIVE. Lucent, and Intel and Sony and Disney... They have a hard row to plough. They MUST convince the consumer that there is a reason to purchace music on a proprietary protected format instead of the free one. If only EPAC was to mp3, what CDs are to cassettes. Why do people buy CDs instead of just making cassette copies? Because of the advantages. It is certainly not the shiney cover. CDs sound better, and last longer. There may not be this stark a difference between EPAC and mp3. Nomatter what.. EDIG is a GREAT play!!! An emerging technology (compressed digital music) that is shaking the SNOT out of an esablished industry (our friends the record companies), with the backing of the CREAM OF THE CROP TECHNOLOGY GODS (LU INTC TXN). And on top of all this it is an INTERNET play!!! Oh Yeah... It's also blasted through MAJOR resistance today without so much as a flinch... If it can hold on to $1 - 1.25 for a couple days I still say watch out moon!! cAPSLOCK (edig since forever.. ;)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next