SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (56634)4/28/1999 2:14:00 AM
From: Rob Young  Read Replies (2) of 1575513
 
Rob - Re: " EV68 is the Merced killer. Not only is it on par performance wise but
Compaq points out it will be 1/5 the cost."

EV68 will kill Merced, eh?

I've made a mental note of that.

-------

Paul,

You're a tricky one. Perhaps "Merced Killer" is a bit strong.
Merced will thrive, if it ever ships. The reason it will thrive
is the same reason "no one ever got fired for recommending IBM".
There are a LOT of drones or lemmings out there. What? Well...
if you think about it, it will take a lemming-like attitude to
choose Merced if EV68:

1) Outperforms it (or is on par)
2) Costs 1/5 the price (ideal at the "low-end" $2000-$5000 point)
3) Runs IA32 binaries faster than Merced
4) More native apps FRS

Perhaps you say 1) *maybe* 2) *maybe* 3) *doubt it* 4) *doesn't
matter* but then again, we don't know do we? Because with Merced, we are still talking serious vapor. Do we yet know how many transistors? Do we yet know how many integer units? Wattage?

At less than 1/5 the cost of Merced EV68 will more than keep Merced honest.

One other thing, focus on 2) above. Merced can't touch it in
that price band. Those $10000 Merced workstations ought to be
real popular.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext