V$gas, since your acting as the spokesperson for Mr. Gordon, it's apparent that you do not have an answer. Pretty much what some of us expected.
While I won't do tit-for-tat I'll try to keep this question infront of the thread until someone has an answer besides the obvious. Once we determine Mr. Gordon's motives for hijacking these shares from the shareholders then and only then can balanced decisions be made about the investment value of TSIG.
While I'm still a fan of the plan, and it's really Mr. Hwangs plan, look at www.TSIG.com, but as long as the wrong jockey is in the saddle and he's working with a stacked board there's too many questions that because of history don't add up.
Now for the moment can you answer the question?
Meanwhile, I still haven't gotten your answer to the very serious question that I posed in that post. It was not rhetorical.
Why did Mr. Gordon first run the shares through his bank account for a whopping personal financial gain before lending the proceeds back to the company at such usurious and egregious rates?
After all he had just lost the company's shareholders more than $25,000,000 in equity, more than $1 per share at the time, on sales of less than $3,000,000 in two years. This latest plan, really J Hwang's plan wasn't even a glimmer on the horizon at the time of the share hijacking. So please don't tell us he was rewarding himself for performance.
Since you have appointed yourself Mr. Gordon's defender-of-actions, please enlighten us to the factual as opposed to the rhetorical rational for this apparent continued and ongoing activity.
Unless of course you bring us news this morning that Mr. Gordon has made his loan agreement to the company null & void.
Anxiously awaiting your answer and straining to hold these leashes....
SC |
