SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Earlie who wrote (57755)4/28/1999 1:26:00 PM
From: J. P.  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
Hi Earlie,

Don Hays mentions your NYT IBM comments his market commentary, although he does not mention you by name.

wheatfirst.com

<<IBM's earnings was clearly the catalyst to excite the markets, as their first quarter report showed revenue increases of 15 percent, and 42% in earnings--blowing away everyone's estimate. Of course, you know I couldn't let that good news go by without throwing a little cloud over them, so I am amazed that the market chose to add $30 billion of market cap to Big Blue as a result. Especially when I notice that the robust revenue gains were mostly in PC sales, where they have consistently lost money. We also note that the year over year comparison was against a horrible first quarter last year.

One analyst cited in the New York Times, points out that IBM's average annual revenue growth in 1997 and 1998 was 3.7%, and that the annual growth in the operating profit declined from 5.8% to 0.7%. It was in this environment that the price of this big-cap stock has moved from 70 to yesterday's close of 209. That seems to be a big gain for rather mundane operating performance. It makes you wonder why, until you see that the company has been buying back stock at a frenetic pace. Their number of shares has decreased by 22% since 1995, using internally produced cash flow. But their cash flow was not sufficient to fund these massive stock buybacks, as they added over $7 billion of corporate debt. It looks to me as if the price increase is not so much a function of their performance, as their own buybacks--another sign of the times.>>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext