SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stormweaver who wrote (5736)4/28/1999 5:28:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 17770
 
James--- Again, not bad but...
1. The United Nations had the opportunity to condemn the action, but did not take it. Therefore, it has implicitly sanctioned the action.
2. I will not repeat...
3. If the situation were as I said, we picked the right side.
4. Italy was an ally during World War One, and that did not prevent us from invading in altered circumstances.
5. I agree with point five.

For the other set:
1. As I've said, they were massing for such an action anyway, and after Bosnia we had reason to expect a humanitarian catastrophe.
2. I agree that we botched things with the Russians.
3. I tried, in my points, to outline the reasons for NATO to intervene, and therefore why this was not a "blank check" on intervention. I will refer you back to that post.
4. The cost is fairly modest, as these things go, and it all depends on whether or not it is a justified intervention. If so, the cost is no great matter.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext