SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR)
QLGC 16.070.0%Aug 24 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ronald rollins who wrote (21587)4/28/1999 6:32:00 PM
From: David Andersen  Read Replies (1) of 29386
 
I too believe that there must be at least one signed but unannounced OEM.

When asked if the company was shipping product on any unannounced OEM's they claimed the constraint of NDAs. If there is no contract there is no NDA to prevent the company from answering the question. They are under an obligation to give us the truth. If the company has no unnannounced OEMs, they can say so. To avoid the question by claiming the protection of a nonexistant NDA would be clearly misleading.

Only if there is an unannounced OEM with an NDA can the company honestly answer the question in the manner in which they have.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext