SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (44402)4/29/1999 8:07:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
Noecon, I thought you would find this interesting...

Ex-Intel Worker Loses E-Mail Fight
April 29, 1999

SACRAMENTO - The Associated Press : A judge ordered a disgruntled former employee who bombarded Intel Corp. workers with company-bashing electronic mail from sending any more of the messages.

The ruling came Tuesday in the case of Ken Hamidi, 51, of Citrus Heights, an Intel Corp. engineer fired in 1995 over unresolved claims of job-related injuries.

Hamidi started a group called Former and Current Employees-Intel, known as Face-Intel, devoted to proving that Intel mistreats its workers.

Intel, a Santa Clara-based producer of microprocessors, says the stories posted on Face-Intel's Web site _ such as blaming Intel for one worker's suicide and accusing the company of running a sweatshop in Malaysia _ are untrue.

Hamidi also has waged a direct e-mail campaign, sending Intel employees messages seven times.

Sacramento Superior Court Judge John R. Lewis granted Intel's request that Hamidi be barred from sending electronic missives to its workers.

The company argued that Hamidi's e-mails, sent on separate occasions to as many as 30,000 Intel employees, were the equivalent of trespassing on the company's private computer system.

Lewis agreed.

''The mere connection of Intel's e-mail system with the Internet does not convert it into a public forum,'' the judge wrote. ''The court finds that Hamidi's e-mails are not protected speech.''

The Intel vs. Ken Hamidi case gained national attention among First Amendment advocates. Some fear the ruling could significantly restrict the freedom to send e-mail to specific groups of people.



Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext