SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (10847)4/29/1999 9:22:00 AM
From: Mark Johnson  Read Replies (1) of 27311
 
Larry for those who don't follow Yahoo, I thought this was an interesting post describing your two-faced ways....

{<{Still shoveling manure Janus??? Although your claim that...<<<"The facts as I have stated them are indisputable.>>>...begs the point of why you are such a strident hypster for your own part. What do you have to gain? However, I digress...

Your love of the self-important, grandiose, swaggering display is noted however your facts are less impressive.

Your "fact" regarding 'apparant' liquidity and 'apparant' financing are fully disputable due to a non-release of information concerning any 'apparant' or possible receipt of funds from previously arranged draw-downs or pre-approved, as it were, loans. On top of that, you hypothesize the current burn rate and 'probable' shortfall, giving an opinion based upon an assumption. Since when are opinions facts? Since when can assumptions be regarded as facts? As you strut your stuff you are doing exactly what FMK is doing with numbers. Exactly. From a negative perspective, and portraying the outcome as FACT, unlike Fred who has clearly stated his that his assumptions are 'potential'. In short, on this one point you continue to operate as a two-faced liar.

Your hype for/against $600 million in licensing fees. There is not one shred of substantiation that disproves the potential for this amount. Still making up 'facts' to fit your schema. Your hype against purchase orders. You assume, that your opinion is the only correct interpretation. Wrong again.

As for running one shift on one line per day twists things again. "One production line" is the public announcement. Not limited to one shift. However, the prospect given through thorough analysis of potential by others has given rise to the possiblility in theory. However. Like your other 'facts' things are twisted justenough to fit your means. Bozo! Think that others can't see right through your hype. Mr. '...former long term long..." How long is long? A week, two? Liar.

Your position is clear, your hype is foggy. You lie. Plain and simple. You distort, assume, and opine and call it 'fact'. Will you be running for President anytime soon? You have many of the 'apparant' qualifications.

Buckle Up! bozo....

M
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext