It has always seemed that if anyone ever dared to question Anthony on this thread, that person would be hung.
Huh? Personally, I don't know where this comes from.
Anthony is, understandably, particularly sensitive about being accused of lying or unethical behavior. Professionally, he deals with adversaries who lie, cheat, and steal, and he has been called upon to testify against them in the past. To be professionally effective, as well as true to his ethic, his integrity has to be above reproach. When people wander into the thread and accuse him of fruntrunning, stock manipulation, etc., he is pretty forceful about defending his reputation. Can't blame him for that one iota.
The other pushback I see is when someone (almost always a new face) wanders in and complains about one stock pick going the wrong way (when 95% have been profitable, or when they took a ridiculous entry point).
But to honestly disagree about something -- where's the problem? Hung for that? Can you cite an example of what you are talking about? Stock opinions? Heck, we all vote with our own $, we're grownups, right?
Alan
|
