Lil e,
The basic idea, overall concept, is what I was saying was for the most part right.
It accuses Janice of bashing INFE, DGIV, and SGNC... if she posted four messages between those three boards over the past year, I'd be very surprised
A couple days ago, I posted that I didn't remember Janice doing any real bashing here. She bashed my use of the English language a bit, but hey, that's no biggie! She did make well over 4 posts here, as did her friends. Consider yourself "hypothetically surprised". The RB post didn't just point out Janice (in my mind)but a "group". I guess it is the "et al" that wore out it's welcome here.
Yes, Janice did end up being correct in MTEI, and I pointed that out in my link here. It wasn't the DD she did, but the delivery that turned everyone away from believing it. Alot of that "remarkable" DD came out after the majority of us had started skipping her posts AND the replies to it. If it had been delivered with a bit more tact and sincere concern instead of trashing and pomposity, then perhaps myself and others could have been spared alot of pain. Sometimes, it's just a matter of who you chose to believe, and no manner of dd will change our hard heads.
I don't follow ANZT or CYGS. I stopped reading INFE and SGNC when the compatriots showed up. OH...and "yes", I do own that stock (sgnc). I had quit reading that group's posts by the time they got to SGNC. It seemed like they were targeting a certain person's stocks, no matter what it was. Again, perhaps if things had been handled a bit differently, then I would have read and given credence to those posts. There is just something about a caring, concerned individual posting how ignorant I am that just turns me off.
Lil e...it isn't just that group. The overall point of that post made a good point. Some people, in their "quest to save the lost and ignorant" cause great disruption to threads. They should come, say their piece, and go. If we get scammed, then fine, we have been warned. The RB post was dead on the money when it said people are not posting on SI because of these people. We are forming "behind the scenes" groups like "Benji", or taking info to pm's and email. A darn shame considering the amount of lurkers here who need the "peace of mind" that some of that information could possibly give, but have no access to those behind the scenes goings on.
I don't know lil e...it's all a matter of opinion how you look at things. I looked at that post as a bit of overkill, but overall, it made sense. The idea of a conspiracy on a stock thread, from both sides, is becoming more and more of a reality daily.
I appreciate the decent way you questioned me about my linking that post. Seriously, I know you could have reaked more damage on me easily. It's been a long week and it's late here, so I'll use that as my excuse for rambling on in my reply to you.
I really didn't want to start a debate with that link, and probably should have just posted it without comment.
Have a nice weekend.
E'Lane
|
