CYGS is responsible for some very notable advances in the field of Biomed and yet little old Janice has chosen to attack them with lies, innuendo and a fervor that could have been put to very good use in investigating the truly scam stocks rather than those of companies who are actually performing research, development and product.
Having been the victim of lies perpetrated by Janice, I naturally am not the worlds most objective source. In one instance Janice hurled accusations that I had received free stock from a company in exchange for my receiving a contract from said company and had failed to disclose this. That would have been a violation of several laws. It was simply untrue ... a fact that Janice has never been willing to admit, but instead she then accused me of "setting her up" by my choice of wording.
Her deciding that you are actually Del has me rolling on the floor with laughter at her ineptness. This is as laughable (and totally wrong) as her accusing AZNT's Mike of being "Icabod." Oh, and BTW, I don't know which 'soaps' she is referring to, but I know first hand that Del has been a spokesman for at least one federal agency, a federal board, a major Canadian/US trade union and a coalition of major American corporations. One episode of a series was an international award winner. Could this be jealousy?
The only SOAPS Janice should be concerned with are the ones she needs to use to wash the fibs out of her mouth.
She has attacked our Mike on this thread with lies and innuendoes. Never accused, never indicted, never convicted, and according the a prosecutor involved in the mess she likes to refer to, never a serious candidate for any legal action. The interesting fact is that she has never even acknowledged any positive contributions he has made. Wonder why she has chosen to avoid speaking with Del, Mike or Charlie directly and has instead relied on the words of a couple of scamster anti-abortion fanatics. Great investigative techniques.
She loves to interject people who had various levels of association with cygs in the early days. Oh yes, there were several questionable occurrences, but they are history and the current management not only took over the operations and prevailed, but have brought about very significant advances in their field. Does she ever mention them ... only in derisive terms which are nothing more than distortions. And the people she uses as 'sources' even include some of the very people who were responsible for the early 'crap'.
Now that BW has filed suit, she and her little gang are attacking BW. This is the same Business Wire that she (and that same little gang) have used as sources in the past and quoted them freely when it fit their fancy. Could this be the same level of hypocrisy of which she has freely charged others.
Winthrop, you may pity this poor poster, but she really needs something other than pity. The great shame and irony in all this is that she COULD be doing a service to all of us, but instead chooses to skip the service and concentrate on an agenda that certainly appears to be nothing except a pathetic campaign of self aggrandizement.
I am sick of the crowd that screams about 'pump and dump' artists and then devotes themselves the 'slash and burn' campaigns. I still can not find a difference between them.
Hogger, Adm(Hon)
Anything but perfect
Checkered Past
|
