SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (27144)5/2/1999 9:07:00 AM
From: REW  Read Replies (2) of 44908
 
***TO ALL --- IMPORTANT --- Frankel Board consideration***

I have been placing a lot of thought into the proposition brought to the management of TSIG concerning the appointment of Martin Frankel to the Board of Directors. It is my feeling the fractured method of delivery, multiple request, along with the non-response of many shareholders will dilute the decision process to non-consideration.

Therefore, I am going to test the waters to see if there will be enough unity and commitment to warrant the bringing up of the shareholder request to management again. I will be looking for additional representation to give the carrying of the request enough weight to have a strong possibility of being passed.

I am not asking for immediate response at this time. Trust me, all will know if there appears to be enough support to warrant calling for resending the shareholders information to go along with the request for addition of Mr Frankel to the Board. I intend to do some fact finding next week.

The request for further expansion of the Board is not unreasonable. The Board should be made of individuals of diverse backgrounds and bring to it views from varying perspectives. It is also not unreasonable or disadvantageous for the Board to have a shareholder representation. The actions of the Board should be in the interest of the shareholders at all times since the success of the company is the prime desire of the shareholders.

Everyone should also know that Mr Frankel is more than a doctor. He has performed dedicated tasks for TSIG in the past with the Cohesive contact and pressure to develop the contract arrangement that produced the MyMusicCard site. He also was directly responsible for the introduction, request and acceptance of John Hwang to the Board of Directors and then involved in the move of Mr Hwang from Cohesive to TSIG resulting in his appointment as a Sr VP.

He is continuing his high interest and drive to have TSIG become the best it can be. That can, at this point, IMO, be best served as an active Board of Directors member.

Mr Frankel has also been involved in other public and private companies through their developmental stages. He has seen and been involved in the positives and negatives of their developments and has seen and experienced the results. He brings solid experience to the Board and will use that experience to aid in the advancement of TSIG.

It must also be known that with the inclusion of Martin Frankel to the Board he will very likely be required to remove himself from posting directly to the shareholders through this or any other forum and be relegated to those informational actions approved by the Board members.

The company is developing to the point that it will soon be advancing well enough on it's own to become apparent to the shareholders and interested investors of it's potential and direction. The next several months should finish setting that stage.

Again, I do not wish to start or have extensive debate on this issue. I will not be overly conversing on this matter publicly and do not intend to make this a public outcry. This forum is for the discussion of the possible and potential developments of TSIG.

Allow the time necessary for the fact finding to take place. When the support seems to be sufficient and the action warranted, there will be a call for resubmitting the necessary information. At this point I am deleting the prior requests of the shareholders that responded to the last drive.

This time, if called for, there will be a specific format asked to be followed. Those that do not wish to follow that format stand a good chance of not having their opinion considered by the company.

Thanks for your attention

Bob

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext