SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : MARUM RESOURCES ON ALBERTA
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (1780)5/3/1999 12:22:00 AM
From: George S. Montgomery  Read Replies (1) of 2514
 
Chuca:

Thanks for your post. (Yeah, geo is for George. And George is the furthest thing from a geo(logist) that you can imagine!)

This is my final note on 'stacked kimberlites.' My question obviously makes no sense, so I will drop it.

See, I thought there was the prevailing idea that diamond was found in kimberlite pipes. Then, I thought, a new idea came into play, the idea of horizontal layers of sedimentary rock or such.

I liked the 'new idea.' It made sense. Rick Boulay said it would take two years for the 'new idea' to become broadly accepted.

Then came the report that spoke of 'stacked kimberlites.' These were presented, I thought, as something between pipes and layers. They were considered potentially of interest.

And my question was: Is MMU dealing with a horizontal layer of prospective material - as had been claimed - or is it all still in the hypothetical stage?

I obviously have misinterpreted something - because my question makes sense to no one. So, I will stop asking my question. geo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News