Gold Price Monitor Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor

GDXJ 94.04

+0.6%

Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: goldsnow who wrote (33103)	5/3/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: Ahda	Read Replies (1) of 116764

Several years ago i read a theory that the ideal rate was somewhere around 2.7 percent. Within that theory there was automatic increase in wage due to positions elevated on a ladder and the top was not heavy. The problem in this particular cycle is the vast difference in wage level. The minimum is still there for many. Two jobs one in household are required in that area . This is a standard for Asia but here i get very confused as to what is norm and normal take home pay for the majority. Within the larger area's the requirements are vast for housing cross country the picture changes somewhat. Accounting for populous however I tend to think brokerage and financial institutions are carrying a great percentage of the actual wage, that bulk in my opinion plus tech creates an erroneous roughly 12.00 average.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next