SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ericsson overlook?
ERIC 9.540+0.4%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: P2V who wrote (3203)5/4/1999 12:57:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 5390
 
Mardy, terrestrial networks seem just fine for cities and once out of cities, the Globalstar system seems the best method. Admittedly I have costed them, but 21 km high means signals won't go from inside a house with a corrugated iron roof to the satellite. Horizontal signals seem better.

Maybe it makes sense, but not to me at present. Storms, crashes, capital cost, coverage to inside buildings, propagation distance disadvantage to terrestrial, control, technology upgrades.

Anyway, 37 GHz isn't aiming at mobile phones, but maybe at WLL residential Web connections. Also, from experience, rain interrupts satellite connections [at whatever my Starnet service frequency is]. That might be part of the game while the Web is in infancy, but when people are used to ADSL and better, they won't want to go offline when it rains.

Maurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext