SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc
ATHM 23.13+0.3%Jan 23 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Boplicity who wrote (9004)5/4/1999 1:42:00 PM
From: yihsuen  Read Replies (2) of 29970
 
To all,

I have this question for quite sometime. Go ahead and laugh if you think it's stupid, but I do need to get this clear away from my mind. So, please help.

Remember about three years ago, the so-called Internet Phone was hot for a while and vaporized soon after? I do have a few friends successfully made it to function back then. One of the problem is the party you are calling has to be on-line at the same time, just the initiation of a call would be a big hustle. It got killed for lack of convenience.

Since cable modem is always on, theoretically, it shouldn't be too hard to write a utility to constantly pooling a centralized site for every few seconds and check for the incoming call, right? If ICQ can be such a smashing success, how difficult would that be to create a centralized hub and to get Internet Phone becoming a viable solution again? Voice conversation over the Internet shouldn't create too much of burden to the bandwidth should it?

I don't see T/TCI can stop people from doing that, and if we can call the other parties with cable modem connection, then I won't mind to wait till IP telephony become cost effective. The bottom line is this always-on feature of cable modem.

Comment, please.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext