SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wlheatmoon who wrote (58494)5/4/1999 2:23:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Sneaky, aren't you? -g- As I thought and thought and thought, it seems likely that the deal will not have huge premium. Not because it make any fundamental sense, but because I had a huge position as of yesterday's close. -g-

Here are some numbers you may want to consider for June, July 50 strike calls. [BTW, 2001 LEAPS for 50 don't make much sense to me unless of course you want to go long on JNJ. Deep ITM LEAPs, OTOH, make a lot of sense, though. And, I have 35s for 2000, FWIW.]

If CNTO was offered $5 bil - all in stock, the take over price would be 61. If JNJ slips 5% CNTO will be approximately at 58. COnsidering contingencies and arbitrage slippage, you can get 57 for your shares or $7 for 50 strike price calls. Possibly this is the best case scenario. The worst case scenario: ~53/share (guess work) and with the slippage and all June 50/July 50 calls will be merely worthless. So, any price below 53 will be bad for your 50 strike calls. IMO.

Here is what I did - I let go some of my greed. Cashed in 3/4 of all my June and July 50 calls for about 50% profit. Now that I took one hurdle out, who knows, the deal may be bigger than $5 bil.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext