SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INFOSEEK (GO)
GO 10.68-1.2%1:40 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: eik who wrote (9093)5/4/1999 7:38:00 PM
From: Chip Roos   of 9343
 
Also from Raging Bull board
<<I hate to burst your bubble but Jim Preissler from Paine Webber doesn't seem to be to swift in my opinion.
I had been solicited by a PW broker for the past year. He sent me Preissler's buy recommendation on SEEK from March 17 when the stock was around $80.00/share. Preissler targets a $110.00 price as a 12 month target.
After watching the stock drop from 80 to 60, I e-mailed Mr. Preissler asking if he was still recommending SEEK. No response. I e-mailed him again two days later. No response. So I bought the stock from A. G. Edwards, made a few points and bailed.
Now the stock is in the low 40's and still no response from Mr. Preissler. If any of you would like to question this "expert", its preissj@painewebber.com Don't hold your breath for a reply though.

All in all, this jerks lack of response saved my a bundle. And I am probably going to jump back in at these levels.

Good luck to all,

Chip >>

So if Preissler loved SEEK at 82, and loved it at 60, and loved it and 50, he must want to marry it at 45 and below. These analysts are a joke (in my opinion, of course).

But I will buy back in if the stock hits 43 or below tomorrow. And if SEEK hits the $110 price that guru Preissler is spouting, I might even consider marrying him.....nah....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext