SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 161.39-1.9%Jan 15 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marginmike who wrote (29159)5/4/1999 8:32:00 PM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (3) of 152472
 
Mike - Does anyone Know if a dual 1800/900 frequency phone is any advantage in CDMA.

There are three different bands/modes of interest to Qualcomm in the US:

1) PCS - 1900MHz CDMAOne - Coverage limited to cities and highly travelled routes.

2) Cell CDMAOne - 800MHz - I think the coverage is generally even worse than PCS CDMAOne although I haven't actually checked recently to see how many AMPS cell providers have switched to CDMAOne.

3) AMPS (Analog) - 800MHz - Available almost everywhere, but a real battery hog, and with limited services available.

The 2700 series (1900 CDMAOne/800 AMPS) has the advantage of using PCS when it is available, but gets all the coverage of AMPS. (It's a pity there is no 2700 series thin phone.) I don't think that currently a 1900 CDMAOne/800 CDMAOne phone exists (??) but if it did, given the limited coverage of 800MHz CDMAOne, I'm not sure how useful it would be.

JMO

Clark

PS This is all off the top of my head. I have never actually done any detailed research on 800 MHz CDMAOne coverage, so take it with a grain of salt.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext