SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DWIGHT who wrote (26843)5/6/1999 9:53:00 AM
From: Rusty Johnson  Read Replies (1) of 42771
 
Rivals Gain From Windows 2000 Delays As Sales Shift to Sun, Novell and IBM

By DAVID P. HAMILTON
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Late is better than never for Microsoft Corp. and the next incarnation of Windows -- but it may not be good enough to trump some re-energized competition.

This week, Microsoft began shipping what is expected to be the final test version of Windows 2000, an operating system that is the company's most ambitious attempt yet to take on high-end corporate computing chores. Up to now, those kinds of jobs have been dominated by rivals, notably the widely used Unix system.

Yet where the Redmond, Wash., company was once expected to dominate corporate data centers as thoroughly as it does desktop computers, Microsoft now faces a drastically altered landscape.

Windows 2000, the successor to its Windows NT line, is widely considered the largest and most complex commercial software program ever written. The software giant is a year late in finishing it, effectively sidelining the company at a pivotal time -- as companies invest in powerful server computers to manage exploding Internet traffic, electronic commerce and increasingly sophisticated corporate data systems.

The final version of Windows 2000 isn't expected until late this year at the earliest. Making hay in the meantime have been some of Microsoft's chief competitors, notably Sun Microsystems Inc., International Business Machines Corp. and Novell Inc.

"There was a high-water mark a few years ago when people thought NT would take over the high end," says Scott Winkler, an analyst with Gartner Group. "Today, NT is used for certain roles in the enterprise but not others."

Not that Microsoft has done badly. The company boasts that it has sold four million licenses of the server version of Windows NT, and the product was a major factor in a 43% jump in its net income in its fiscal third quarter ended March 31. International Data Corp., Framingham, Mass., estimates that Windows NT accounted for 36% of server operating-system units shipped in 1998, compared with 24% for Novell's NetWare and 17% for Unix of all types.

But unit sales aren't the only important measure. Unix-based computers and IBM mainframes have larger market share in revenue than Windows NT, in part because they run big databases and other corporate applications that serve many more individual users. Windows NT, while sometimes used in more demanding roles, is most often used to handle simple tasks such as managing a group of PCs that share files or a printer cluster. "It's clear that one is not replacing the other," says Dan Kusnetzky, an IDC analyst.

Unix systems are particularly popular at Internet service providers and increasingly complicated Web sites that handle electronic commerce, where reliability, security and ease of maintenance are paramount. Consider the experience of TheStreet.com, a financial-news Internet site in New York City, which earlier this year replaced its Windows NT servers with Sun servers running that company's Solaris brand of Unix.

Dan Woods, chief technology officer at the company, said the NT systems were slower than the new Sun machines, prone to crash under heavy Internet traffic, and difficult to administer even with a large technical support staff. "When we'd get to a certain load level, NT would totally fall apart, and the whole machine is dead," says Mr. Woods. "Unix, when it gets to a certain level, response times go up, but everyone eventually gets through, and the machine doesn't blow up." Microsoft declined to comment on TheStreet.com's experience.

Other rivals have benefited from delays in Windows 2000. The free program Linux, for example, is used at some Internet service providers and corporations that want to be able to modify the underlying source code of key software to tune performance.

Novell, all but given up for dead a few years ago, has also gotten a new lease on life. The Provo, Utah, company's NetWare operating system competes with NT in managing corporate data networks. Lately, Novell has been promoting the product's directory technology, which keeps track of every user logged into a network and all devices connected to it.

Windows 2000 will include a long-delayed response called Active Directory, but Novell is expected to retain its technology edge for a while yet, raising the odds that NetWare will retain a place at companies that use the Microsoft operating system for other tasks. "Customers are looking to us to manage NT [servers] with our directory," says Christopher Stone, Novell's vice president for strategy. "This is a whole new game."

Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's hyper-competitive president, at times sounds a bit frustrated that his company hasn't put such rivals away. But he and his subordinates argue that economic forces are on their side. Windows NT servers, built from the same components as personal computers, continue to fall in price faster than rival machines, and run cheaper software.

Windows 2000, meanwhile, will help close the performance and reliability gap. It is designed to scale up to work on much more powerful computers, Microsoft executives say, and is much less likely to require frequent rebooting. "This will be an operating system that people will be comfortable using in extraordinarily demanding situations," says Edmund Muth, a Microsoft group product manager for Windows NT.

After three years of development, Microsoft engineers partied last week when its third test version went to manufacturing plants. Some of the most exhausting work has been eliminating bugs that have sometimes accompanied other new Microsoft operating systems. Jim Allchin, the senior vice president who oversees all Windows products, says the company remains on track to ship Windows 2000 in 1999, but believes meeting customer-quality demands is more important than meeting the deadline. When that job is done, there always will be successor products to think about.

"This is not the end, this is just a place in time," Mr. Allchin says. "We'll all have jobs for a long time improving this thing."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext