<< It is ethically, religiously, and legally forbidden for me to target innocent beings as a strategy to hurt my enemy. >>
NATO is not "targetting" innocent beings. My friend, I am surprised at you. You know that this isn't true.
This brings to mind the pity of all dictators. Most people would rather live in freedom. But, when a dictator comes to power, it brings forth the question of "greater evil".
To remove Hitler and his evil partners in genocide, most of Europe and Russia lay in ruins.
Perhaps the best way is to cut off the head of the snake. I don't understand why NATO doesn't try an all out attempt to get rid of Slob and Dog Face. If someone worse takes over that doesn't know how to behave himself in a civilized manner, take him out also. Sooner or later they would get the point.
NATO's actions follow the theory of the "greater evil". If you can save hundreds of thousands of lives by military action, where innocent civilians "might" be harmed, what do you do? |
