SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: D. Long who wrote (7144)5/6/1999 8:47:00 PM
From: Stormweaver  Read Replies (4) of 17770
 
Your wrong: The Rambouillet agreement was an ultimatum, far from a reasonable negotiation process. It called for a force of NATO only force of 30,000 and a referendum in 3 years for independance. This was NATO's ultimatum not the U.N.'s. As you now see we are negotiating and we have it down to an acceptable figure of 30% NATO forces, 30% russian and 40% other. As I indicated (and Henry Kissinger said) competent negotiation would have averted this disaster.

Regarding the arms race we disagree again. Seeing that the U.S. (under the guise of NATO) broke U.N. agreements, nations around the world realize that to truly protect themselves against having their internal domestic policy dictated by the U.S. they need to arm themselves. Blair's 50th aniv NATO speech hinted toward NATO's expanded role in the new millenium as being pro-interventionist.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News