Rande Is . . . HOME Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KevinThompson who wrote (6364)	5/7/1999 12:10:00 AM
From: Frederick Langford	Read Replies (1) of 57584

Ya know what Kevin? You seem to have one heck of a chip on your shoulder. What's your problem anyway? You condescendingly flame me for a spelling error on another thread, now you are acting like Wayne's trying to con someone.... Give me a break. Wayne is sincerely excited about the possibilities presented by XNSI and brought it to Rande in good spirit. I posted on the stock myself. I read Rande's boards enough to know he likes to find his plays early on so didn't bring it to the HOME thread. Wayne rarely posts outside his thread, just because of guys like you. If you followed his thread he plays BB's and NASD and does very well. He has the respect of his readers just as does Rande. Guys like you, so smug, could take a lesson from these guys. I question your logic as well. Granted the stock has made a good move, but being up .75 certainly does not limit upside possibilities. They have cash, a very nice website, up and running, and great market share. They are certainly NOT touting their stock with useless PR's, which is refreshing. There are companies trading over twice what XSNI's trading for, with a whole lot less to offer. You remind me of the guy that told me WCAP was 'finished' @ 10 and the bloke who told me SFE @ 24 was 'overbought'. Anything you have a positive attitude about? Fred

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next