Since you seem to know better than me, what are my intentions?
Also, since you again seem to know better than me, what is my job? Is it not to do what is best for the shareholders? If so, does this not mean doing whatever possible to keep the NASDAQ listing? And as I have stated earlier, simply buying up the stock is not a viable alternative since we will have too many "pros" working against us.
As to new deals/projects, we are working diligently to put these together - but large, company-maker deals take a lot of time to put together. And a large, company-maker deal is the only thing that will save this company. As an example, Arakis' Sudan project was definitely a company-maker, and that deal took two years to negotiate, another two years before the first commercial flowed, and then a further 3+ years to complete the pipeline.
Will you please stop your pointless, nonconstructive ramblings, and instead start offering some legitimate, viable suggestions of what you think we should be doing? This would be better for all of us.
If you have some better ideas as to what can be done in the near term to retain the NASDAQ listing, please let us know about them. And if you want me or any of the other directors to leave, please give us some good suggestions for replacements.
Why are you afraid to meet with me? Are you afraid that you will discover that my ideas are better - and more realistic - than yours?
DRR |
