Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 163.30

+2.3%

Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (29391)	5/7/1999 9:56:00 AM
From: Jeff Vayda	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Ramsey Su: Two things. First, what happened with the previous spin offs? LWIN was removed from the Q at the discretion of Q management in order to make Q more profitable. Same thing was done with the infrastructure division. Secondly, Jacobs has stated that fairness is a criteria. Fairness requires equal treatment. If they did it before, they need to do it again. (whatever 'it' was) Let us see if he can hold Ericy's feet to the fire and make them pay up.(my reading of the current conflict) Secondly, These employees are not departing voluntarily. The company is cutting them loose. Individual firings/layoffs may forfeit the options but in the case of an entire division, (IMO) a case can be made that the options were forfeited at the convenience of the company and as such the company is liable. Jeff Vayda

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next