Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 45.51

+10.7%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (80567)	5/7/1999 12:48:00 PM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (3) of 186894

Paul, RE:<<Why didn't you choose the LOWEST PRICE for Intel in 1997? Wouldn't fit your agenda - would it>> It also would be even more deceptive. Example--look at Compaq. Most on this board have been incessant about how poorly Compaq has performed. Yet under your analysis, Compaq has done much better than Intel. In the spring of '97, when Intel was setting its own lows, Compaq traded below $15, split adjusted. As of today, under your flawed analysis, CPQ would be up 70%, much better performance. Yet that is deceptive. Intel has performed much better than Compaq. And Compaq's sharp fall from its highs in indicative. Yet when Intel is compared to companies that have performed well but are in better sectors, its performance has lagged. Has nothing to do with my agenda--indeed, I really don't have an agenda here. If somebody here is pulling "cock-n-bull shit" numbers out their derriere, it is you.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next