Trader14u, I am well aware that the Stockhouse.com "Red Flags" article deals with hypsters...
You stated:>>> Shorts don't manipulate in the way that promoters do<<<
Well, I strongly disagree, and since you seem to have difficulty finding the parts of the article that apply, let me direct you too them...
>>>1. Someone who hyper-posts on only one stock.
During the promotional run of that stock, he may be posting between 8 and 20 messages daily <<<
Your group dominates ZSUN and SHAL exclusively..
>>> 3. Someone who repeatedly attacks or belittles others on a stock's message boards. <<<
Read the post that I am responding too, among others....
>>>9. Someone who goes out of their way to find bad news about the company and makes a "case" out of it.
These individuals might include ex-friends, ex-family (divorced) and ex-employees, including ex-promoters. Such people don't just post a single negative item. They either take one negative and make it look like "the sky is falling" or they continuously bring it up. That an individual makes frequent appearances to vent their spleen is the clue, which gives them away. Disgruntled investors usually move on and don't want to be reminded of their bad investment. <<<
Isn't that what this comes down to in a nutshell? Do you feel that you have the right to violate rules of conduct and common decency in order to "drive your point home?
Many others portions of the article also apply, such a the vicious responses to anyone not aligned with your thinking...I am very concerned with the manner in which the detractors conduct their business...Here is the link again; if you read it carefully, you will see why I posted it...just take a moment and review it, sometimes substituting "shortster" for "hypester."
stockhouse.com
BTW, I have not posted anything positive or negative about this company...but you still attack me and disparage my contribution...
Best Regards! Live the Golden Rule! Smile!
Peter |
