Some more important points to the "article"...
1) This publication has NEVER had anything good to say about Naxos
so consider the source
2) Ray Steele's involvement ended 3 years ago and he has not returned since.
3) If Naxos did anything actually wrong, as opposed to careless, why did a three judge panel find them innocent?
You have to ask yourselves something. Why did Bob Gardner work so hard to maintain control of Naxos? Because he sees no hope? Because the pilot plant is bombing? I doubt it. I don't know any more than you do, but I see how hard they are working at keeping this afloat. And it's not for the money, as Bob has spelled out for all of us.
My reason to have hope is because of the integrity of Bob Gardner, the lack of hype since he has taken charge, the lack of leaks since he has been in charge and the success (internal as it may be) of Martin Blake who has brought 14 other properties into production, and based on that record could likely be working anywhere he wanted, but chooses to stay here with Naxos. Ungrateful though we are.
Tim, if you have any articles about past activities of Martin Blake or Bob Gardner which would offer genuine insights, I would welcome them. They would be helpful and important for us to see. But to be the pawn of the Canadian press, which has never had anything good to say about Naxos, has not a hint of unbiased reporting and therefor, little credibility.
Tom F.
|
