SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (17556)3/6/1997 4:45:00 PM
From: Jeffery E. Forrest   of 58324
 
Allen, I'm remembering the 60-70% figure from early FALL when I was telling this thread to go short. I will try to track down the quote, BUT I've a pretty long memory and I remember we went over this rebate deal ALOT.

As I remember KE made a statement to the effect that the rebates were between 50-70%, BUT closer to 70 than 50. I took this to mean 69% ;-)

EVEN at 50% though, this is a MUCH higher rate of return than is normal. I have an article SOMEWHERE from the USRX thread discussing how MOST people just don't ever get around to using the rebate. I believe 25% is even considered on the high side of "normal".

Bottom line is that I think IOM was blindsided by their own success. I would bet my last dollar that when the IOM management was sitting around discussing a rebate they had no idea that it would take so much out of their pockets.

If YOU were selling ZIPS and wanted to promote them with a rebate, would YOU WANT your customer base to ALL ask for a rebate? I think not. Nobody is that altruistic.

You'd be hoping like hell that your customers would throw the rebate slip into the junk drawer and forget about it.

That said, Let me say I still LOVE my ZIP. Those CD-writes are starting to look VERY affordable and reliable though. I hope IOM has a PLAN for the future, cause my ZIP is already looking OLD.

Good Luck
Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext