Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: PiMac who wrote (12266)	5/8/1999 8:52:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) of 13994

PiMac: There is no recourse against a bad law except to change it or get a court to set it aside. The principle of the rule of law does not give each of us the right to decide for ourselves which laws suit us... Clinton ratified this discovery process, and it is ironic, not snide, to point it out. As for protecting against "collateral damage", that is not a defense against perjury, although it may be a mitigating factor in sentencing... The suit had already been appealed, and the reason that the President settled before a ruling was that it was widely believed that the appeals court would re- instate the suit. In any event, whether or not Judge Wright made a summary judgment based upon the evidence before her has no bearing on whether he defrauded the court, which is why she still cited him for contempt and imposed stiff penalties... Judge Wright did nothing wrong... The disposition of the suit is independent of the question of whether or not Clinton acted in a manner contrary to the Constitutional trust reposed in him....

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next