SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 472.94-2.2%Jan 2 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Fischofer who wrote (22383)5/9/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: RTev  Read Replies (3) of 74651
 
. AOL allows me to access it via the net (even though it would prefer that I access the net via AOL) whereas MSN does not. Therefore unlike the MSN model, which is fatally flawed, AOL is technically able to deal with the emerging reality even if the adjustment will involve some wrenching transitions.

How so? There may be some features of MSN Internet access that I don't understand, but it strikes me that it's the other way around.

Virtually all of MSN is now a pure internet service. You can see any of it using any internet connection. AOL, on the other hand, has significant content -- message boards, chat rooms, and their proprietary email system -- that cannot be accessed from an ISP. Plus it uses a proprietary user interface that allows it to control what the user sees. AOL could be argued to have weaker content than MSN, which makes them highly vulnerable if they lose their user interface.

You say AOL is a destination. That's just as true (in some cases more true) for MSN. Even without significant ISP subscriptions, it's the third-most-popular site on the net. What do you see as the "fally flawed" part of this model?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext