IGCO - Intergold Corporation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : IGCO - Intergold Corporation

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Vinarub who wrote (36)	5/9/1999 5:12:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) of 69

Let's talk about true COC now. Auric is not allowed to be the unchallenged tester - writer and all just based on ONE Dames and Moore Test Audit. I agree it has the potential to be big, but COC is not done this way. Right? I think we saw and were disaapointed by Auric at another investment of mine in Summer 1997...I am LONG in this one as a contrary bet that those COC avoiding fools just might pull it off this time, a recoup of my wasted bucks when they wanted ...a piece on my Bankkrupt Play Stock...ala ....JV with their own client...rumor that was stated my old B.P.Stock management but never named in an old PR. But hey, that management was put befor a East Coast Nasdau Hearing and Haulted them - so what do I know. Other than the fact that if they have the gist...they can do it right. I resent 10 share estimate and see it as way too dam early. But hey, at $100 in the ground..estimates even in Brex Days folks were talking $25 -50 and now folks are talking way less. The $100 should be 15 and the shartes price///$1.50 right where it is now. Get COC and raise it. Release lab details and GET ME to up my position. ChucaCOC my word!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next