SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (37703)5/10/1999 12:26:00 PM
From: Graystone  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
For Legal Purposes
or
Consensus is immaterial, in this case, agreed.

Consensus is never irrelevant.
Legal systems predicated upon common law change.
Common law often reflects popular opinion. Witness the fact that women are allowed to vote and alcohol is legal.
How do you think that came about ?

The idea that the crowd can be wrong is appealing when confronted by a mob, however, denying women the vote would not have been possible, keeping alcohol illegal was not possible, consensus made it so even before the laws were passed. This is not commentary about the Webnode3 case.

The Webnode3 case has a legal aspect, I am sure. In the end, the legal aspect is dwarfed by the consensus. Business Wire is acting very stupid, like a politician who insists that women should not have the vote, or one who insists that Prohibition is right.

Stupid is, as ...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext