Since you are noted as a good writer, I am sure you have been taught to investigate your facts before writing them. I would like to know what the actual facts are behind your statement that, "There have been plenty to substantiate the validity and the potential of MRPS.."? Are you trying to say that because a whole bunch of posters say the same thing that what they said is factual? I can't believe that a writer would say that. Are you also trying to say that only "brian,Dave,Joe-MA, JoeinIowa,Dabloc Trader, etc." are the only ones on here who have "pretty busy lives"? I can't imagine that you could back up that statement with any factual information. And, are you also trying to say that people are "a bit weary of reading" other posters? I would hope you wouldn't be saying that. Would you please try to back up your contention that "These gentlemen have done an amazing amount of DD.."? What exactly is an "amazing amount of DD"? And, how good is DD that is based upon no factual information to the general public from MRPS concerning financial reporting? And, what does the statement mean that "The beauty of MRPS is that you DON'T have to constantly watch this thread for the ups and downs.."? And, how can you provide any facts to back up the contention that, "...this company is sound,..."? Just what are you basing your decision on? How do you know this company is "sound"? |