|
Please share with the group specifics, i.e., contrast Imp's 'capabilities' vis-a-vis engineering know how, market name acceptance, management savvy, production capacity, niche identification, industry alliances, or ANY other objective criteria. I don't want to sound challenging: I just would love to know of any tangible, rational, reason to believe Imp could garner support @ 5.00. If you've looked at their corporate reports for several years, and followed this thing, you will have to agree that the company floated along for a long while before IOM at the same valuation, and with no volume until the huge runup and collapse, fueled by IOM enthusiasm and speuculation, with management's rosy scenarios taken on faith. Outside of IOM, they haven't done much. The EPAC has been pretty much a bust. I'm not aware of anybody beating a path to the door for value added services. The end of IOM relationship also was the shape of things to come for the other relationships Imp was in. Carrington (and cronies) insider gymnastics put the stake in the heart of this guy for many of us. I just hang around to see what's gonna happen next. |
