SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (7884)5/11/1999 11:46:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 17770
 
Bill, before things began I said that it was possible that the mission would not be so bad, because there were other actors besides Clinton in NATO and the Pentagon. I have said practically from the start of operations that they were bungling, but hoped that they would correct some of their mistakes. As they piled on mistakes quickly, I soon said that I hoped for a ceasefire and renewed negotiations with a strong Russian involvement ASAP. However, I did not call for unilateral cessation because all sides continued to need an incentive to negotiate, and a sudden cessation on NATO's part would be seen as a capitulation. I want a framework for negotiation first, an agreement on the key items that must be included. We must try to rectify some of this mess, for example by insisting upon repatriation. I also, however, fear intransigence on the part of the Administration. In sum, we never disagreed on whether or not THIS mission was moronic, but on whether or not it had to have been, and what should be done about it....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext