VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: P. Ramamoorthy who wrote (11103)	5/11/1999 4:46:00 PM
From: mooter775	Read Replies (1) of 27311

In my opinion, the lawsuit is not a positive, but it is certainly not a deal breaker. Whether or nor the batteries (1) are better than existing li-ion cobalt batteries out there for cellphones or laptops, and (2) can be produced efficiently on the NI lines for both product categories - these are deal breakers. The ability to close a contract prior to the end of June and have the alternative of public rather than private financing - to me this is an impediment, but not a deal breaker. I believe that the current Valence batteries out in the market are better than existing li-ion batteries currently being offered. And I believe that product improvements in existing li-poly technology will "obsolete" current li-ion technology - reasonably quickly. So I don't worry about broker or market-makers' positions, since they are irrelevant to the long-term success of this or any other company - they just reflect the short-term perception of any company. If you or any other investor "buys into" Lev Dawson and the potential represented by their li-poly products, then feel comfortable with the stock and the company. If you don't, wait, or buy a competitive product. I'll hold.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next