SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gord Bolton who wrote (3298)5/11/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: russet  Read Replies (1) of 7235
 
Winspear's sill is accessible on land,... is this one
If not the environmentalists and "give me bribe money" folks will be all over it. For example,...will Aber get a mine soon??


Nunavut weighs in on Aber

Boundary issues need to be addressed

Richard Gleeson
Northern News Services

NNSL (May 10/99) - The Nunavut government wants its concerns addressed in
the review of the proposed Diavik diamond mine.

Deputy minister of sustainable development for the Nunavut government Katherine
Trumper, has identified a number of concerns about the proposed diamond mine that
would have an impact on Nunavut, among them:

the contribution of the mine to the economies of both territories

potential impact on the Coppermine watershed

potential impact on the migration of the Bathurst Caribou herd

In an April 19 letter to DIAND deputy minister Scott Serson, Trumper asked that the
Nunavut government be involved in any revision of the draft report on the review.

Trumper also requested that Nunavut be involved in any and all aspects, including
changes to the project, which could have trans-boundary implications.

The mine is located about 100 kilometres west of the NWT-Nunavut border.

Meanwhile, all parties involved in the Diavik environmental review are carefully
considering the impact of a court decision last month that overturned federal approval of a
giant coal mine proposed for Alberta.

The Cheviot mine, as it is known, was to be located just outside Jasper National Park. Its
pit was to be 23 kilometres long and three kilometres wide.

In his April 8 decision, Judge Douglas Campbell of the Federal Court of Canada said the
environmental assessment of the proposed Cheviot mine came up short in several ways,
among them:

it did not properly consider the cumulative effects on the environment of existing
and probable future development

it failed to adequately consider alternate mining methods that would have less
environmental impact than the proposed open-pit method

"This new case has raised the bar for environmental assessments," said Canadian Arctic
Resources Committee research director Kevin O'Reilly.

Cumulative effects are the combined environmental impacts of the project being
considered and others existing and proposed for the same area.

CARC, along with Ecology North, officially withdrew from the Diavik review last
October, saying the process was flawed in several different ways, among them the way it
dealt with cumulative effects and alternatives to open-pit mining.

DIAND contracted an independent expert to study alternative methods of extracting
diamonds at the Diavik mine. Guidelines for the environmental review require that
cumulative effects be examined.

O'Reilly said CARC has accepted an offer of assistance in dealing with the Diavik review
from the Canadian Environmental Defence Fund. CARC has retained a lawyer, said
O'Reilly, "to consider our options."

Diavik's public affairs and government relations manager, Doug Willy, in an address to the
NWT Chamber of Commerce earlier this year, called cumulative effects "the next
anti-development tool from the (environmentalists)."

The company hoping to build the Cheviot mine, Cardinal River Coals, could appeal the
ruling to the Federal Court of Appeal.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext